Latest topics
» Help in making a errata/FAQ
Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:56 pm by wombatdazzler

» find Notes of Schermagliatori
Wed Jun 21, 2017 11:07 am by reneseeder

» Will the Army list be changed by Impetus 2
Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:14 am by dadiepiombo

» Opportunity Charge clarification
Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:11 am by dadiepiombo

» Different base size
Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:07 am by dadiepiombo

» Main unit and Support unit in second combat
Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:02 am by dadiepiombo

» Toughening Up CP
Thu Jun 15, 2017 10:46 pm by Cyrus The Adequate

» An Ancient Campaign using Sabin's Empire as a basis and Basic Impetus (augmented) to fight the battles
Thu Jun 15, 2017 5:53 pm by 1ngram

» Averaging cohesion tests
Thu Jun 15, 2017 1:05 pm by Cyrus The Adequate

Impetus at Derby?

Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:29 am by Cyrus The Adequate

Anyone interested ? 7th & 8th October at a new venue - Bruntingthorpe …

Comments: 10

Wintercon '17 July 15-16th

Sat May 06, 2017 11:44 pm by Tarty

Canberra July 15th-16th

Basic Impetus 2
28mm
Game days are Saturday and Sunday


Comments: 0

BI2 tournament - 25 March 2017

Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:08 am by RogerC

Would anyone be interested in a 28mm Basic Impetus 2 tournament on 25 March …

Comments: 24

28mm Impetus Competition York Sunday 5th February 2017

Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:44 am by Cyrus The Adequate

The traditional start to the Impetus Competition calendar in the UK is York in …

Comments: 80

1° BASIC IMPETUS tournament

Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:19 am by PAPERO

in Castegnato , near Brescia, Sunday, 08.01.2017 Cool

1st tournament BASIC …

Comments: 3

Cancon '17 Canberra, Aus

Mon Nov 07, 2016 2:15 am by Tarty

Cancon '17
Canberra, ACT

28mm  400pts
Friday 27th and Saturday 28th of …

Comments: 0

June 2017
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Calendar Calendar


Averaging cohesion tests

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Averaging cohesion tests

Post by Granicus Gaugamela on Wed Jun 14, 2017 1:47 pm

Following on from the "Toughening up CP" thread I'd like to start a discussion about another house rule.

Cohesion tests become 2d6/2 round down.

Reason being we currently have an even 1/6 chance of every type of result happening from extreme stoicness to cowardly custard.

Implementing the 2d6 halved round down mechanism brings the bell curve into play and "normalises" results by tending to give an average result.

You can still get an extreme result of cowardice and collapse by rolling a double 6 (11 halved rounds down to a 5) which is a 1 in 36 instead of a 1 in 6, and the ultiamte stoic nature is displayed if you roll a double 1 or a 1+2 or 2+1 which makes that a 3 in 36 (or 1 in 12) chance.

Weeds out the regular occurrence of extreme results, including the death of a commander, whilst still keeping the result interesting and different enough from the roll to hit - roll to save - remove kills mechanism.

Thoughts appreciated

Granicus Gaugamela
VBU 4
VBU 4

Posts : 435
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2014-05-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Averaging cohesion tests

Post by Cyrus The Adequate on Wed Jun 14, 2017 2:50 pm

Totally changes the nature of the game in favour of higher VBU units and at a cost of flavour, interest and excitement. Also while it is true it does reduce the bell curve a little it does not really help to even out results - you would have to roll many more d6 to do that in any meaningful way

As you can see I have zero interest, however I'd be interested to see other players thoughts. Having said that if it was adopted for v2 I'd be retiring. Turning Impetus into another stale mathematical exercise akin to DB.... is a really retrograde step

Just my 2p
avatar
Cyrus The Adequate
VBU 5
VBU 5

Posts : 522
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-05-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Averaging cohesion tests

Post by stecal on Wed Jun 14, 2017 6:57 pm

going from 1/6 to 1/36 is too much. games would never end.

I could see an argument that if the CT target number is a 7 or higher and you roll a 6 that you need to roll a 2nd die for 4-6 to fail, 1-3 meaning you pass.

stecal
VBU 3
VBU 3

Posts : 132
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2015-02-06
Location : Philadelphia, PA USA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Averaging cohesion tests

Post by Granicus Gaugamela on Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:13 am

Cyrus The Adequate wrote:Totally changes the nature of the game in favour of higher VBU units

Not really.

A VBU4 unit taking 1 measly hit from a long range skirmisher shot is smashed the the point of uselessness if they roll a single 6.  They can no longer perform a meaningful function against the enemy, they take up space in the line, they must be interpenetrated.

Is that something really useful to the game?

Do we really think it makes sense?

Is it more likely that they will take a disorder only rather than disordering and lose half their total capability and about 90% of their effectivity from that single long range hit?

That's not to say they CAN'T take 50% losses, it just means they need to roll a 6,6 instead of a single 6.

And it means leaders aren't testing on average every sixth melee round to see if they're killed...

Cyrus The Adequate wrote:
and at a cost of flavour, interest and excitement.

Not sure how you consider an equal chance of any event occurring "flavour, interest and excitement", it would appear to be more the very definition of boring equality across the board.


Cyrus The Adequate wrote:
Also while it is true it does reduce the bell curve a little it does not really help to even out results - you would have to roll many more d6 to do that in any meaningful way

Um, a single d6 has no bell curve, it's a straight line.

2d6/2 brings IN the bell curve, albeit slightly modified as a result of the need for rounding

.....d6........2d6/2............................................Difference
1...16.7%...3/36 (rolling 2 or 3 total) = 8.3%.......-8.4%
2...16.7%...7/36 (rolling 4 or 5 total) = 19.4%.....-2.7%
3...16.7%...11/36 (rolling 6 or 7 total) = 30.6%...+13.9%
4...16.7%...9/36 (rolling 8 or 9 total) = 25%........+8.3%
5...16.7%...5/36 (rolling 10 or 11 total) = 13.9%..-2.8%
6...16.7%...1/36 (rolling 12 total) = 2.8%............-13.9%

So it focuses the results around the centre, extremes happen but far less often.


Cyrus The Adequate wrote:
As you can see I have zero interest, however I'd be interested to see other players thoughts. Having said that if it was adopted for v2 I'd be retiring.

Presumably you say you have massive interest in seeing it not occur.  If you had zero interest you wouldn't stamp your foot and threaten to retire.

I quite like ultimatum givers, they stamp their feet and go red then blue in the face with a combination of rage and then suffocation from holding their breath until they get their way, so I now think this should be made official in Advanced Impetus starting immediately for no other reason than to call your bluff...

If you can't pick it, feel free to add sarcastic smiley in here.

Cyrus The Adequate wrote:
Turning Impetus into another stale mathematical exercise akin to DB.... is a really retrograde step

Not sure how it's a "stale mathematical exercise", but if you believe any gaming system isn't a set of probabilities and the reactions we make to them then you're not looking closely enough.


Last edited by Granicus Gaugamela on Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:17 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Spacing the probability table)

Granicus Gaugamela
VBU 4
VBU 4

Posts : 435
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2014-05-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Averaging cohesion tests

Post by Cyrus The Adequate on Thu Jun 15, 2017 1:05 pm

Not sure how to respond to that. It appears that you feel the need to make personal attacks if someone has the affront to disagree with you and your latest proposal.

As for ultimatums and stamping of feet - I'm not stamping my feet, and if my face is a little red its because I've been catching a little sun in the garden. I'm just stating a view. I think that's still allowed here?

And on the subject of ultimatums why is my disagreement such an issue to you? Its not like we are likely to play against each other, and after this current little outburst I can safely say my life is not diminished by that fact one iota.

I understand bell curves btw - and it is you that are proposing to introduce them. I just think trying to use any combination of d6 to normalise probability will always fail unless you apply a great many results.

So - back to the proposal. Yes it does mean that in some circumstances a VBU 4 unit will have a better chance of surviving, however it also means that a higher VBU unit has now a very much higher chance of not taking casualties. That's a retrograde step and would diminish the fun I get from playing knowing that the chance of my piss poor peasants surviving an impact or causing a casualty on those knights has moved from one in six to one in thirty six. Those moments are the ones I like, the ones I think my fellow players like. They are certainly the thinngs we talk about after the game and the ones which mark Impetus out from the herd. Take that away and the fun of the game diminishes (for me). And the fun is why I play

I'm pretty sanguine about your proposal because I think in reality it would have a 0% chance of being adopted. The only positive I take from your post above being to confirm my initial impression of you - so thanks for that.

Feel free to imagine any smileys you want, however I doubt there is one that expresses my opinion of you at the moment
avatar
Cyrus The Adequate
VBU 5
VBU 5

Posts : 522
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-05-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Averaging cohesion tests

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum