Latest topics
» An Ancient Campaign using Sabin's Empire as a basis and Basic Impetus (augmented) to fight the battles
Today at 3:04 pm by 1ngram

» Averaging cohesion tests
Yesterday at 10:19 am by Tankred

» VISABILITY
Sun Aug 20, 2017 1:45 am by Gaius Cassius

» Basic Impetus v Impetus?
Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:25 pm by Zippee

» Some questions
Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:35 am by RogerC

» Basic Battles expansion
Thu Aug 17, 2017 7:18 pm by stecal

» any players in the northwest ?
Thu Aug 17, 2017 2:56 pm by Jim Webster

» Impetus Competition Derby Worlds 2017
Wed Aug 16, 2017 4:31 pm by slowjoecrow

» First 3 games with Ptolemaics
Fri Aug 11, 2017 5:29 pm by Jim Webster

Impetus Competition Derby Worlds 2017

Sun Jul 02, 2017 4:42 pm by Cyrus The Adequate

There will be a 28mm Impetus Competition at Derby World Wargames on 7th …

Comments: 6

Impetus at Derby?

Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:29 am by Cyrus The Adequate

Anyone interested ? 7th & 8th October at a new venue - Bruntingthorpe …

Comments: 11

Wintercon '17 July 15-16th

Sat May 06, 2017 11:44 pm by Tarty

Canberra July 15th-16th

Basic Impetus 2
28mm
Game days are Saturday and Sunday


Comments: 0

BI2 tournament - 25 March 2017

Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:08 am by RogerC

Would anyone be interested in a 28mm Basic Impetus 2 tournament on 25 March …

Comments: 24

28mm Impetus Competition York Sunday 5th February 2017

Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:44 am by Cyrus The Adequate

The traditional start to the Impetus Competition calendar in the UK is York in …

Comments: 80

1° BASIC IMPETUS tournament

Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:19 am by PAPERO

in Castegnato , near Brescia, Sunday, 08.01.2017 Cool

1st tournament BASIC …

Comments: 3

August 2017
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Calendar Calendar


Next One: Large Unit losses.

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Next One: Large Unit losses.

Post by Granicus Gaugamela on Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:09 pm

OK, I guess I'm on a roll so I may as well see who else I can fire up...

Large Units.

King of the battlefield in tournaments and games in general.

Taking my beloved Swiss pike as an example, they have VBU 6 in front, VBU 5 second rank (and they oblique up roads as they skip and dance across the battlefield to create merry hell for my opponent).

Their VBU progression for calculating attack dice and, more importantly critical number, when compared to a VBU 8 CP is as follows:

Loss....Large......CP
Start...6.(+5).....8
1........6.(+4).....7
2........6.(+3).....6
3........6.(+2).....5
4........6.(+1).....4
5........6............3
6........5............2
7........4 etc.......1 dead


So the loss of VBU swings very rapidly from the VBU8 CP to the Large unit at the third loss which also reduces the start point of crit number and thus losses from 6 to 5.

The effect of this critical number start point (and it doesn't take more than a few melees to realise critical number is the crux of Impetus) is massive.

When both sides are at VBU 6 or above the critical number for the probable single hit taken remains at 6, a 1 in 6 chance to suffer a permanent loss.

As soon as the 3rd loss is taken the single probable hit means the Large unit is still rolling a 6 to fail whereas the CP are now taking a loss on a 5,6.

In statistical terms (a dry mathematical exercise but one that is at the heart of the game) that means the CP have a 100% greater chance of suffering a permanent loss.

And from there it deteriorates rapidly, the double whammy of losing VBU attack dice and thus generally scoring less hits combined with the ever increasing probability of taking more and more losses when rolling against lower critical numbers means that the CP are likely to be destroyed well before the Large Unit even loses its back rank. Certainly barring some very unlikely results the CP will lose their combat effectiveness well before the large unit does.

So, the proposition I am advancing is this:

For large units losses must be apportioned so that the VBU or the front and rear ranks is as close to each other as possible.

This would mean that the Swiss v CP comparison above becomes:

Loss....Large......CP
Start...6.(+5).....8
1........5.(+5).....7
2........5.(+4).....6
3........4.(+4).....5
4........4.(+3).....4
5........3.(+3).....3
6........3.(+2).....2
7........2.(+2).....1
8........2.(+1)... dead

Which seems a far more reasonable proposition.

Equally it would mean for the more unusual large units that have a strong melee front unit and slightly weaker missile rear unit (say a 5/3 combination) the melee troops would take the first two losses until the large unit becomes a 3/3 after which the rear unit starts taking losses in turn. This reflects the difficulty that missile troops have in filling the melee ranks in the large unit.

Bit of a long post but one I think worth considering.


Granicus Gaugamela
VBU 4
VBU 4

Posts : 435
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2014-05-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum