Latest topics
» Why can Longbows Fire at Point Blank Range & Not Others?
Yesterday at 5:49 pm by Zippee

» "Long Spear" if not in a large unit
Yesterday at 3:35 pm by Eques

» What are the main Changes between Impetus & Baroque?
Yesterday at 3:29 pm by Zippee

» Looking for Players in the Midlands (UK)
Yesterday at 2:53 pm by Eques

» Improving Pilum?
Tue Dec 12, 2017 5:03 am by Tarty

» Help in making a errata/FAQ
Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:07 pm by prapor

» Dragons de Vaires 2017
Sun Dec 10, 2017 7:41 pm by Bobo

» What are the Benefits of being in a Group?
Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:25 pm by Tankred

» BI2-Samurai 'Big Battle'
Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:36 pm by Tankred

Vapnartak York Feb 2018- format options?

Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:26 am by Cyrus The Adequate

Hi everyone

I was pondering the options for the York competition and wondered …

Comments: 11

Basic Impetus 2 Comp, January 2018?

Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:03 am by Aurelius

Would anyone be interested in a 28mm Basic Impetus 2 tournament, Saturday …

Comments: 15

Impetus Competition Derby Worlds 2017

Sun Jul 02, 2017 4:42 pm by Cyrus The Adequate

There will be a 28mm Impetus Competition at Derby World Wargames on 7th …

Comments: 47

Impetus at Derby?

Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:29 am by Cyrus The Adequate

Anyone interested ? 7th & 8th October at a new venue - Bruntingthorpe …

Comments: 11

Wintercon '17 July 15-16th

Sat May 06, 2017 11:44 pm by Tarty

Canberra July 15th-16th

Basic Impetus 2
28mm
Game days are Saturday and Sunday


Comments: 0

BI2 tournament - 25 March 2017

Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:08 am by RogerC

Would anyone be interested in a 28mm Basic Impetus 2 tournament on 25 March …

Comments: 24

December 2017
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Calendar Calendar


Improving Pilum?

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Jim Webster on Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:26 am

If you don't want legionaries with pilum then you're really looking for Late Romans Very Happy
avatar
Jim Webster
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 492
Reputation : 12
Join date : 2014-05-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by GamesPoet on Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:11 pm

I tend to agree with not making the Pilum optional.

Don't see the Roman generals waking up in the morning, and saying, "Ok gentlemen, we're not bringing our pilums with us today, we're just bringing shields and swords."

GamesPoet
VBU 3
VBU 3

Posts : 232
Reputation : 6
Join date : 2015-05-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Gaius Cassius on Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:41 pm

I don't think GG is proposing that players get to choose whether Roman legions are armed or not armed with pilum. I think what he was saying was that players could choose to model the pilum effect either by paying for it outright and using the current rules or instead see it as modelled within the rating of the Roman legions (ie. one of the reasons they are VBU6) and taking the reduction in cost.
avatar
Gaius Cassius
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 780
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Tarty on Fri Jun 19, 2015 12:47 am

Gaius Cassius wrote:I don't think GG is proposing that players get to choose whether Roman legions are armed or not armed with pilum. I think what he was saying was that players could choose to model the pilum effect either by paying for it outright and using the current rules or instead see it as modelled within the rating of the Roman legions (ie. one of the reasons they are VBU6) and taking the reduction in cost.

If you don't pay for pilum then they become just another VBU 6 FP....sounding like a choice to me.

Margherita without basil isn't a Margherita anymore.
avatar
Tarty
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 533
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2014-05-19
Location : SYDNEY

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Gaius Cassius on Fri Jun 19, 2015 1:45 am

Tarty wrote:
Gaius Cassius wrote:I don't think GG is proposing that players get to choose whether Roman legions are armed or not armed with pilum. I think what he was saying was that players could choose to model the pilum effect either by paying for it outright and using the current rules or instead see it as modelled within the rating of the Roman legions (ie. one of the reasons they are VBU6) and taking the reduction in cost.

If you don't pay for pilum then they become just another VBU 6 FP....sounding like a choice to me.

Margherita without basil isn't a Margherita anymore.

Yes, I agree from a modelling point of view there is a choice. I was more responding to the comment that posters were making about generals waking up and deciding whether the troops would be armed with pilum or not. It is a question of modeling pilum, not whether historical troops our figures represent are armed with pilum.
avatar
Gaius Cassius
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 780
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by GamesPoet on Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:29 am

I wasn't suggesting that pilums be modeled or not ... lol. That's a good one! Lol ... best laugh I've had in a good while, thank you! : )

GamesPoet
VBU 3
VBU 3

Posts : 232
Reputation : 6
Join date : 2015-05-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Granicus Gaugamela on Fri Jun 19, 2015 3:17 am

I was actually positing a solution that had pilum as an option in and of itself. From my reading they weren't always used in period, sometimes they weren't effective etc.

Let the player choose and accept the consequences, personally I'd be taking them as for 3 points they're a cheap potential disruptor, but others may choose to use slightly different tactics, which I believe could be supported by historical readings.

Equally it's just a suggestion, not worth dying in a ditch for.

Granicus Gaugamela
VBU 4
VBU 4

Posts : 440
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2014-05-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by GamesPoet on Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:06 pm

Lol ... good to know I understood it correctly, and sounds like if there's historical evidence to back it up, my comment regarding the Roman general telling his troops not to take them seems irrelevant. My apology and thank you.

As for modeling pilum's, I actually have Romans modeled both ways ... lol. Life is such a hoot.

GamesPoet
VBU 3
VBU 3

Posts : 232
Reputation : 6
Join date : 2015-05-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Jim Webster on Fri Jun 19, 2015 5:26 pm

Granicus Gaugamela wrote:

Equally it's just a suggestion, not worth dying in a ditch for.

Very few things are


After what you might consider 'mature consideration' I think it's possible for a player to feel that Legionaries are 6/2 (or whatever) precisely because they do have pilum. In which case you could feel that adding a pilum rule is a case of gilding the lily.
If an opponent explained this to me and none of his units ever had pilum, I'd be fine with that.

If on the other hand he had pilum when fighting against army x but not when fighting against army y, or had it for some units but not others (With the obvious exception of Punic wars republicans Smile  ) then I'd feel it was a bit gamey to be honest and just an attempt to minimax the army

Jim
avatar
Jim Webster
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 492
Reputation : 12
Join date : 2014-05-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by ChasTSS on Tue Oct 31, 2017 12:00 pm

I appreciate that this is a long-dead thread, but I am a returnee from the old forum.  Having played Impetus since it first came out - but only for Feudal European and then, only with heavily modified lists.
The rules have enthused me to re-work my own ancient ranges and, finally, with the early Empire/late republic completed, I started painting.....
Returning to the Forum, I stumbled over this thread and my interest was piqued.
Last night, my fabulous Gauls took on a Caesarian Roman Army - 500 pts and, buoyed by confidence of my large warbands and the puny Pila, advanced on the thin red-shielded line of Romans.
i can only say that, catching Numidian cavalry with Gallic cavalry is a thankless task and it is not possible to ignore them.  That took care of my right flank.  On my left, the Italian and Spanish mediums took care of my cavalry and they fought each other to a standstill.  In the centre, my cheating oponent had cunningly placed Scorpios amongst his Cohorts and my skirmishers bore the brunt and vanished all too quickly.  Sadly, my brave groups of warbands started to become less groupish and valiantly charged the Roman line in a valiant effort to breach it.  Then came the volleys of 'overpriced and ineffective' pila.
Gladius stringite!  The Romans surged forward, slowly at first, then quickly as a massacre became evident...

Gentlemen, I hold you entirely responsible for the resulting carnage and the poor little lead widows and oprphans left by my brave warriors and the dastardly Romans.

Next week, I'll run him over with my Parthians....

ChasTSS
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 1
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2017-10-31
Location : Dorset

View user profile http://www,quickreactionforce.co.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by stecal on Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:43 pm

I think a bigger change was the +1 die in melee for B class vs C class.  That is always on.  Oddly, it mostly helps VBU 3 or 4 CL act on almost equal terms vs C class Impetuous cav.

stecal
VBU 3
VBU 3

Posts : 159
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2015-02-06
Location : Philadelphia, PA USA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Gaius Cassius on Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:36 pm

What I have come to appreciate over the past 2 years is that the pila introduces an additional element of uncertainty into any melee with Roman infantry. Even if pilum effect is minimal the fact that it there gives the opponent an element of uncertainty above and beyond the CT. That is not to be under estimated in Impetus.
avatar
Gaius Cassius
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 780
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by stecal on Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:02 pm

Yes, one thing I do like in Impetus is that Roman Legionaires perform as well as they did historically, conquering Europe. In a lot of other rules sets blades or swordsmen are lackluster.

stecal
VBU 3
VBU 3

Posts : 159
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2015-02-06
Location : Philadelphia, PA USA

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by GamesPoet on Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:54 pm

Sounds interesting! I long to complete my Romans and Barbarians and give it a go.

GamesPoet
VBU 3
VBU 3

Posts : 232
Reputation : 6
Join date : 2015-05-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Eques on Fri Dec 08, 2017 10:45 am

I don't think we should be scared of units having weaknesses in rulesets. The strengths and weaknesses of diverse units is what makes Ancients wargaming fun.

I would rather the pila volley was too weak than too strong, to the extent that it comes to dominate the game and make legionaries equivalent to 18th Century Musketeers.

That said, the whole "pila volley" concept in the game is a bit too artificial for my personal taste. Why not just represent it by giving legionaries a higher Impetus stat?

Eques
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 13
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2017-12-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Cyrus The Adequate on Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:02 pm

Eques wrote:I don't think we should be scared of units having weaknesses in rulesets.  The strengths and weaknesses of diverse units is what makes Ancients wargaming fun.


Couldn't agree more. Nothing breaks a game faster than factor creep and we've certainly had that in the past both in beta lists and in some "official" ones.

avatar
Cyrus The Adequate
VBU 5
VBU 5

Posts : 549
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-05-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Eques on Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:09 pm

Cyrus The Adequate wrote:
Eques wrote:I don't think we should be scared of units having weaknesses in rulesets.  The strengths and weaknesses of diverse units is what makes Ancients wargaming fun.


Couldn't agree more. Nothing breaks a game faster than factor creep and we've certainly had that in the past both in beta lists and in some "official" ones.


Factor creep. Thank you, I now have a name for my wargaming pet hate.

Eques
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 13
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2017-12-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Gaius Cassius on Mon Dec 11, 2017 4:12 am

Giving Roman legion units an increase in impetus to represent pilum doesn't help them when they are on the receiving end of the charge.

As I mentioned above, I have come around to the pilum rule as it stands because of the increase in my appreciation for the level of uncertainty that it introduces when engaging legion units. With the secured flank rule and the quality increase I think legions are somewhat better situated than before these changes.

avatar
Gaius Cassius
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 780
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Tarty on Tue Dec 12, 2017 5:03 am

7th edition WRG put me off rules with a penchant for weapon types for ever I think. Pilum does deserve something however... think it's about right now also Gaius.
avatar
Tarty
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 533
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2014-05-19
Location : SYDNEY

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Improving Pilum?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum